Open Access
Review

Table I

Evaluation criteria and scheme of some existing methods for assessing overall agricultural soil quality (evaluation numbers 0 = none/false/worse; 1 = low/few/slow; 2 = medium; 3 = high/many/much/fast/good; 3 is always the best rating).

Criterion ↓ Storie index (1) German BS (2) AEZ (3) VSA (4) M-SQR (5)

Purpose of method
Overall soil rating 3 3 0–1 0 3
Capability rating potential 3 0 1–2 0–1 3
Crop suitability rating 0 0 3 0–1 0–1
Tool for soil monitoring 0 0 1 3 2–3
Tool for soil management/extension 0 0 0 3 2–3
Tool for land use planning 2–3 2 3 1 3

Performance in spatial scales

Field to regional level 3 3 0 3 3
Large regional to nation level 3 3 3 2–3 3
Trans-National 2 1 3 1–2 3

Indicator criteria

Number of inherent SQ(6) indicators (a) 2 1 2 0 3
Number of dynamic SQ indicators 0 0 0 2 1
Climate inclusion 0 0 3 0 2
Interactions between indicators considered 0 0–1 2–3 0 0–1
Potential for assessing soil functions other than productivity 1–2 1 1 1 2–3

Further key criteria

Simplicity in the field 3 3 0 2 2
Applicable without soil test kits 2–3 3 3 3 2–3
Speed of field rating (b) 2–3 3 0 3 2–3
Changes with soil depth included? 2 2 1 1 3

Correlation of scores with crop yields

Field to regional level 2 2 0–1 1–2 2
Large regional to nation level 1–2 1 3 1–2 2
Trans-National 1 0–1 3 0 2

Abbreviations and references:

(1)

Storie index (Storie, 1933),

(2)

German BS (German Soil Rating, Rothkegel, 1950),

(3)

AEZ (Agro-ecological zoning, Fischer et al., 2002),

(4)

VSA (Visual Soil Assessment, Shepherd, 2000),

(5)

M-SQR (Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating, Fig. 2, Mueller et al., 2007)

(6)

SQ (Soil Quality).

(a)

Number of indicators/criteria 1, few < 5, 2 medium (5–15), 3 high > 15.

(b)

Time required for field rating (minutes per pedon/unit): 3 fast < 20, 2 medium 20–40, 1 slow > 40, 0 no field method.