Agron. Sustain. Dev.
Volume 25, Number 1, January-March 2005
|Page(s)||137 - 143|
Effect of fertilizer rate and water irrigation quality on the recovery of 15N-labeled fertilizer applied to SudangrassM.N. Khelila, S. Rejebb, B. Henchia and J.P. Destainc
a Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Département de Biologie Végétale, 1002, Tunis, Tunisia
b Institut National de Recherche en Génie Rural, Eaux et Forêts, Laboratoire de Physiologie Végétale, BP 10, 2080 Ariana, Tunisia
c Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques, 4 rue Bordia, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
(Received 14 April 2003; accepted 4 November 2004)
Abstract - Wastewaters are increasingly used for irrigation of cropping systems in Tunisia. However, to develop environmentally sound practices the contribution of wastewater to crop N nutrition needs to be clarified, especially in cropping systems already receiving mineral fertilizers. For a better understanding of the interaction between fertilizer N and N originating from wastewater, experiments using 15N were conducted. 15N-labeled fertilizer was applied at different rates (0, 60, 100 and 140 kg N·ha-1) and with different water irrigation qualities (tap water or treated wastewater) to sorghum grown in lysimeters during 1998 and 1999. Recovery of 15N-labeled fertilizer in the above-ground crop at final harvest in treated wastewater irrigation was higher at the lowest rate of fertilizer application (54%), with the amount recovered in the crop increasing as the rate of 15N-labeled fertilizer application increased up to the rate of 100 kg N·ha-1. Nevertheless, in spite of this increase in 15N-labeled fertilizer in the crop, total plant N uptake did not differ between rates. Treated wastewater irrigation had no negative effect on the recovery of 15N-labeled fertilizer. About 62 and 55% of 15N-labeled fertilizer was removed by Sudangrass in either tap water or treated wastewater. Neither fertilizer N rate nor water quality had an effect on the 15N-labeled fertilizer remaining in the soil at final harvest. On average 20% in the wastewater treatment (19-24%) and 30% in the tap water treatment (26-31%) of the 15N fertilizer applied were in the 0-60 cm layer of soil at final harvest in 1998 and 1999, respectively, and mostly present in the 0-20 cm layer. The proportion of applied 15N-labeled fertilizer remaining in the soil at final harvest increased with increasing N rates. About 60, 69 and 72% of 15N left in the soil at final harvest was in the surface 0-20 cm layer. Residual 15N was greatly higher in soil following the first harvest than after the final harvest, with the greatest value (38%) measured at the lowest rate of 15N-labeled fertilizer (30 kg N·ha-1). Losses of 15N-labeled fertilizer increased with application rate, but were unaffected by water quality irrigation. Approximately 13% of the applied 15N fertilizer was lost following the application of 100 kg N·ha-1 with either treated wastewater or tap water irrigation.
Corresponding author: S. Rejeb email@example.com
© INRA, EDP Sciences 2005