Grasslands for bioenergy production. A review
Agron. Sustain. Dev., 28 1 (2008) 47-55
Published online: 2007-12-18
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Review of solar thermal technologies in sustainable animal agriculture farms: Current and potential uses
Umar Hanif Ramadhani, Lathifa Nur Ramdhania, Hikmayani Iskandar, Ahmad Fudholi and Haznan AbimanyuSolar Energy 291 113374 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113374
The Effects of Manure Application and Herbivore Excreta on Plant and Soil Properties of Temperate Grasslands—A Review
Arne Brummerloh and Katrin KukaAgronomy 13 (12) 3010 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123010
A systematic review on the use of remote sensing technologies in quantifying grasslands ecosystem services
Anita Masenyama, Onisimo Mutanga, Timothy Dube, Tsitsi Bangira, Mbulisi Sibanda and Tafadzwanashe MabhaudhiGIScience & Remote Sensing 59 (1) 1000 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2022.2088652
Biomass production in farms in Less Favoured Areas: is it feasible to reconcile energy objectives with production and soil protection?
Jana Poláková, Josef Holec and Josef SoukupBiomass and Bioenergy 148 106015 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106015
Grassland ecosystem services: a systematic review of research advances and future directions
Yuanyuan Zhao, Zhifeng Liu and Jianguo WuLandscape Ecology 35 (4) 793 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-00980-3
Optimal management of perennial energy crops by farming systems in France: A supply-side economic analysis
Nosra Ben Fradj and Pierre-Alain JayetBiomass and Bioenergy 116 113 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.06.003
Hydrologic cost-effectiveness ratio favors switchgrass production on marginal croplands over existing grasslands
Yohannes Tadesse Yimam, Tyson E. Ochsner, Garey A. Fox and Bano MehdiPLOS ONE 12 (8) e0181924 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181924
Harvesting biofuel grasslands has mixed effects on natural enemy communities and no effects on biocontrol services
Tania N. Kim, Aaron F. Fox, Bill D. Wills, Timothy D. Meehan, Douglas A. Landis, Claudio Gratton and Jennifer FirnJournal of Applied Ecology 54 (6) 2011 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12901
Carbon Sequestration for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
David A.N. Ussiri and Rattan LalCarbon Sequestration for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation 433 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53845-7_12
Perennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World
S. Jeżowski, S. Ornatowski, J. Finnan, Z. Kaczmarek and J. CerazyPerennial Biomass Crops for a Resource-Constrained World 199 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44530-4_17
1 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527628148.hoc051.pub2
Feasibility of tall fescue, cocksfoot and reed canary grass for anaerobic digestion: Analysis of productivity and energy potential
Vita Tilvikiene, Zydre Kadziuliene, Zenonas Dabkevicius, Kestutis Venslauskas and Kestutis NavickasIndustrial Crops and Products 84 87 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.033
18 77 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21629-4_3
A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production
R.A. Holland, F. Eigenbrod, A. Muggeridge, et al.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 46 30 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.003
Biofuels and biodiversity: Challenges and opportunities
Luciano M. Verdade, Carlos I. Piña and Luís Miguel RosalinoEnvironmental Development 15 64 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.05.003
Giant Reed (Arundo Donax L.) for Biogas Production: Land Use Saving and Nitrogen Utilisation Efficiency Compared with Arable Crops
Federico Dragoni, Giorgio Ragaglini, Elisa Corneli, Nicoletta Nassi o di Nasso, Cristiano Tozzini, Sergio Cattani and Enrico BonariItalian Journal of Agronomy 10 (4) 664 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2015.664
Implications of productivity and nutrient requirements on greenhouse gas balance of annual and perennial bioenergy crops
Stephane Cadoux, Fabien Ferchaud, Charlotte Demay, Hubert Boizard, Jean‐Marie Machet, Emilie Fourdinier, Matthieu Preudhomme, Brigitte Chabbert, Ghislain Gosse and Bruno MaryGCB Bioenergy 6 (4) 425 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12065
91 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5_6
Phytolith carbon sequestration in bamboos of different ecotypes: a case study in China
Beilei Li, Zhaoliang Song, Hailong Wang, et al.Chinese Science Bulletin 59 (34) 4816 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0474-4
Assessing bioenergy potential in rural areas – A NEG-EROEI approach
Oludunsin Arodudu, Alexey Voinov and Iris van DurenBiomass and Bioenergy 58 350 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.07.020
Genetic diversity of natural Miscanthus sinensis populations in China revealed by ISSR markers
Qi Xiang Zhang, Yi Ke Shen, Ruo Xuan Shao, et al.Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 48 248 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2012.12.024
Feasibility of converting agrosilvopastoral systems of dairy cattle to the organic production model in southeastern Mexico
J. Nahed-Toral, B. Sanchez-Muñoz, Y. Mena, et al.Journal of Cleaner Production 43 136 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.019
343 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527675265.ch14
Interplay between yield, nitrogen application, and logistics on the potential energetic and greenhouse gas emissions from biomass crops
Michael D Montross, Seth De Bolt and William C. AdamsGCB Bioenergy 5 (6) 664 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12064
The watershed‐scale optimized and rearranged landscape design (WORLD) model and local biomass processing depots for sustainable biofuel production: Integrated life cycle assessments
Pragnya L. Eranki, David H. Manowitz, Bryan D. Bals, R. César Izaurralde, Seungdo Kim and Bruce E. DaleBiofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 7 (5) 537 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1426
Micropropagation and plant regeneration from embryogenic callus of Miscanthus sinensis
Qi Xiang Zhang, Yu Sun, Heng Kang Hu, et al.In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 48 (1) 50 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-011-9387-y
Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries. A review
Erik Steen Jensen, Mark B. Peoples, Robert M. Boddey, et al.Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32 (2) 329 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0056-7
Late Emergence and Rapid Growth Maximize the Plant Development of Miscanthus Clones
H. W. Zub, C. Rambaud, L. Béthencourt and M. Brancourt-HulmelBioEnergy Research 5 (4) 841 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9194-2
135 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1905-7_6
The relationship between developmental stages of zygotic embryos at explanting and embryogenic frequency on hickory (Carya cathayensis Sarg.)
Qixiang Zhang, Hengkang Hu, Youjun Huang, et al.Scientia Horticulturae 139 66 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.01.010
Comparative Growth, Biomass Production and Fuel Properties Among Different Perennial Plants, Bamboo and Miscanthus
Chuntao Hong, Jia Fang, Aiwu Jin, et al.The Botanical Review 77 (3) 197 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-011-9076-x
The iLUC dilemma: How to deal with indirect land use changes when governing energy crops?
Erik Gawel and Grit LudwigLand Use Policy 28 (4) 846 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.03.003
Land Availability for Biofuel Production
Ximing Cai, Xiao Zhang and Dingbao WangEnvironmental Science & Technology 45 (1) 334 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1021/es103338e
71 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7145-6_5
743 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_33
Biodiversity, Biofuels, Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture
Enrico Ceotto and Mario Di CandiloSustainable Agriculture Reviews, Biodiversity, Biofuels, Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture 5 101 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9513-8_3
Comparing Biomass Yields of Low-Input High-Diversity Communities with Managed Monocultures Across the Central United States
Mari-Vaughn V. Johnson, James R. Kiniry, Homer Sanchez, H. Wayne Polley and Philip A. FayBioEnergy Research 3 (4) 353 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-010-9094-2
BUYING ECOLOGICAL SERVICES: FRAGMENTED RESERVES, CORE AND PERIPHERY NATIONAL PARK STRUCTURE, AND THE AGRICULTURAL EXTENSIFICATION DEBATE
DAVID A. HENNESSY and HARVEY LAPANNatural Resource Modeling 23 (2) 176 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.2010.00061.x
Assessing the productivity function of soils. A review
Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Wilfried Mirschel, et al.Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30 (3) 601 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009057
359 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527628148.hoc051
Land and water requirements of biofuel and implications for food supply and the environment in China
Hong Yang, Yuan Zhou and Junguo LiuEnergy Policy 37 (5) 1876 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.035
A multiple species approach to biomass production from native herbaceous perennial feedstocks
J. L. Gonzalez-Hernandez, G. Sarath, J. M. Stein, et al.In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 45 (3) 267 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-009-9215-9
Bioenergy from permanent grassland – A review: 1. Biogas
A. Prochnow, M. Heiermann, M. Plöchl, et al.Bioresource Technology 100 (21) 4931 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.070
Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing
R. LalHandbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing 455 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845697051.4.455