Implementing isolation perimeters around genetically modified maize fields
Agron. Sustain. Dev., 27 3 (2007) 155-165
Published online: 2007-03-13
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Improving the management of coexistence between GM and non-GM maize with a spatially explicit model of cross-pollination
Benoît Ricci, Antoine Messéan, Agnès Lelièvre, François-Christophe Coléno and Frédérique AngevinEuropean Journal of Agronomy 77 90 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.04.008
How can flexibility be integrated into coexistence regulations? A review
Yann Devos, Koen Dillen and Matty DemontJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94 (3) 381 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6358
Consequences of isolation distances on the allocation of GM maize fields in agricultural landscapes of Germany
Ulrich Stachow, Claudia Bethwell, Angelika Wurbs and Frieder GraefEnvironmental Sciences Europe 25 (1) (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-25-24
Effect of MON 810 cultivation and prevention to adventitious presence in non-GM fields: A case study in Slovakia
Peter Mihalčík, Katarína Hrčková, Martin Singer, Anna Plačková and Ján KraicPlant Protection Science 48 (Special Issue) S11 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.17221/58/2012-PPS
Potential of genetically modified oilseed rape for biofuels in Austria: Land use patterns and coexistence constraints could decrease domestic feedstock production
Dietmar Moser, Michael Eckerstorfer, Kathrin Pascher, Franz Essl and Klaus Peter ZulkaBiomass and Bioenergy (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.004
Assessment of regional capabilities for agricultural coexistence with genetically modified maize
Angelika Wurbs, Claudia Bethwell and Ulrich StachowEnvironmental Sciences Europe 24 (1) 17 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-24-17
Agriculture and proximity to roads: How should farmers and retailers adapt? Examples from the Ile-de-France region
Caroline Petit, Christine Aubry and Elisabeth Rémy-HallLand Use Policy 28 (4) 867 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.03.001
Coexistence of GM and non-GM crops with endogenously determined separation
Emily Gray, Tihomir Ancev and Ross DrynanEcological Economics 70 (12) 2486 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.005
Benefits and Costs of Biologically Contained Genetically Modified Tomatoes and Eggplants in Italy and Spain
Rolf A. Groeneveld, Erik Ansink, Clemens C.M. Van de Wiel and Justus WesselerSustainability 3 (8) 1265 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su3081265
3 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_1
Effect of the structural variables of landscapes on the risks of spatial dissemination between GM and non-GM maize
Marianne Le Bail, Baptiste Lecroart, Arnaud Gauffreteau, Frédérique Angevin and Antoine MesseanEuropean Journal of Agronomy 33 (1) 12 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.02.002
Emerging agroscience
Éric Lichtfouse, Marjolaine Hamelin, Mireille Navarrete, Philippe Debaeke and Agnès HenriAgronomy for Sustainable Development 30 (1) 1 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009055
A model to evaluate the consequences of GM and non-GM segregation scenarios on GM crop placement in the landscape and cross-pollination risk management
F.C. Coléno, F. Angevin and B. LécroartAgricultural Systems 101 (1-2) 49 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.03.002
Agro-environmental effects due to altered cultivation practices with genetically modified herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape and implications for monitoring. A review
F. GraefAgronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (1) 31 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007055
Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review
Yann Devos, Matty Demont, Koen Dillen, et al.Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (1) 11 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008051
Impact of topography on cross-pollination in maize (Zea mays L.)
André Vogler, Henri Eisenbeiss, Ingrid Aulinger-Leipner and Peter StampEuropean Journal of Agronomy 31 (2) 99 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.04.003
Revue bibliographique sur la dispersion des transgènes à partir du maïs génétiquement modifié
Agnès Ricroch, Jean Baptiste Bergé and Antoine MesséanComptes Rendus. Biologies 332 (10) 861 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.07.001
Quantifying the introgressive hybridisation propensity between transgenic oilseed rape and its wild/weedy relatives
Yann Devos, Adinda De Schrijver and Dirk ReheulEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment 149 (1-4) 303 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0204-y
Hybridization, fertility and herbicide resistance of hybrids between wheat andAegilops biuncialis
Iñigo Loureiro, Concepción Escorial, José María García-baudin and Cristina ChuecaAgronomy for Sustainable Development 29 (2) 237 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008059
Sustainable Agriculture
Yann Devos, Matty Demont, Koen Dillen, et al.Sustainable Agriculture 203 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_14
Sustainable Agriculture
F. GraefSustainable Agriculture 229 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_15
Ethics in the Societal Debate on Genetically Modified Organisms: A (Re)Quest for Sense and Sensibility
Yann Devos, Pieter Maeseele, Dirk Reheul, Linda Van Speybroeck and Danny De WaeleJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (1) 29 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-007-9057-6
Comparison of different real-time PCR chemistries and their suitability for detection and quantification of genetically modified organisms
Meti Buh Gašparič, Katarina Cankar, Jana Žel and Kristina GrudenBMC Biotechnology 8 (1) (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-8-26
Sampling and Modeling for the Quantification of Adventitious Genetically Modified Presence in Maize
Theodore Richard Allnutt, Mark Dwyer, Jillian McMillan, Christine Henry and Stephen LangrellJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 (9) 3232 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf800048q
Regulating coexistence of GM and non-GM crops without jeopardizing economic incentives
M DEMONT and Y DEVOSTrends in Biotechnology 26 (7) 353 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.03.006
Simple to complex: Modelling crop pollen-mediated gene flow
Hugh J. Beckie and Linda M. HallPlant Science 175 (5) 615 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.05.021
Environmental impact of herbicide regimes used with genetically modified herbicide-resistant maize
Yann Devos, Mathias Cougnon, Sofie Vergucht, et al.Transgenic Research 17 (6) 1059 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-008-9181-8
Simulation and evaluation of GM and non-GM segregation management strategies among European grain merchants
F.C. ColénoJournal of Food Engineering 88 (3) 306 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.02.013
A method to search for optimal field allocations of transgenic maize in the context of co-existence
Yann Devos, Mathias Cougnon, Olivier Thas and Dirk ReheulEnvironmental Biosafety Research 7 (2) 97 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008004
Regulating coexistence in Europe: Beware of the domino-effect!
Matty Demont, Wim Daems, Koen Dillen, et al.Ecological Economics 64 (4) 683 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.016
Feasibility of isolation perimeters for genetically modified maize
Yann Devos, Olivier Thas, Mathias Cougnon, et al.Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28 (2) 195 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007039