Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review
Agron. Sustain. Dev., 29 1 (2009) 11-30
Published online: 2008-10-23
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
121 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1792-2.ch005
Assessment of interspecies and intergeneric gene flow for the GM Jatropha curcas event X8#34 with high oleic acid content in seed
Kasthurirengan Sampath, Zhang Shilu, Hong Yan, Yogendra Kr. Tripathi and Srinivasan RamachandranGM Crops & Food 16 (1) 235 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2025.2470484
105 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64615-7_5
335 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3261-6_19
Coexistence field trials between MON810 and conventional maize in Mallorca as a basis for a regional regulatory proposal based on scientific evidence in the times of genome editing
Juan Antonio Vives-Vallés, Maria Corujo, Maria Pla and Jeroni GalmésTransgenic Research 33 (3) 119 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-024-00384-y
93 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64615-7_4
Application of fault tree analysis: Failure mode and effect analysis to evaluate critical factors influencing non‐GM segregation in the US grain and feed supply chain
Priyanka Gupta, Charles R. Hurburgh, Erin L. Bowers and Gretchen A. MosherCereal Chemistry 99 (6) 1394 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10601
Application of the maximum threshold distances to reduce gene flow frequency in the coexistence between genetically modified (GM) and non‐GM maize
Ning Hu, Ji‐chao Hu, Xiao‐dong Jiang, Wei Xiao, Ke‐min Yao, Liang Li, Xin‐hai Li and Xin‐wu PeiEvolutionary Applications 15 (3) 471 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13361
Myths and Realities about Genetically Modified Food: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
Angelo Vega Rodríguez, Cristina Rodríguez-Oramas, Esther Sanjuán Velázquez, Arturo Hardisson de la Torre, Carmen Rubio Armendáriz and Conrado Carrascosa IruzubietaApplied Sciences 12 (6) 2861 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12062861
225 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02359-0_12
Coexistence of genetically modified seed production and organic farming in Chile
M.A. Sánchez and H CamposGM Crops & Food 12 (1) 509 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2021.2001242
Bootstrap simulations for evaluating the model estimation of the extent of cross-pollination in maize at the field-scale level
Bo-Jein Kuo, Yun-Syuan Jhong, Tien-Joung Yiu, et al.PLOS ONE 16 (5) e0249700 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249700
The “new agricultural collectivism”: How cooperatives horizontal coordination drive multi-stakeholders self-organization
Mourad Hannachi, M’hand Fares, François Coleno and Christophe AssensJournal of Co-operative Organization and Management 8 (2) 100111 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2020.100111
Risk assessment of pollen‐mediated gene flow from Ga1‐m field corn to dent‐sterile Ga1‐s popcorn
Ethann R. Barnes, Allison C. Barnes, Stevan Z. Knezevic, Nevin C. Lawrence and Amit J. JhalaCrop Science 60 (6) 3278 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20254
Socioeconomic Impact of Genome Editing on Agricultural Value Chains: The Case of Fungal-Resistant and Coeliac-Safe Wheat
Oliver Maaß, Nicola Consmüller and Hella KehlenbeckSustainability 11 (22) 6421 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226421
Evaluation of the Risks of Contaminating Low Erucic Acid Rapeseed with High Erucic Rapeseed and Identification of Mitigation Strategies
Douglas J. Warner and Kathleen A. LewisAgriculture 9 (9) 190 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9090190
Reference Module in Food Science
Luc Schuler, Danny Zust, Dietmar Vybiral and Patrick HauReference Module in Food Science (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22609-7
The Romanian experience and perspective on the commercial cultivation of genetically modified crops in Europe
Mihael Cristin IchimTransgenic Research 28 (1) 1 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-018-0095-9
50 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_538
Teosinte and maize × teosinte hybrid plants in Europe−Environmental risk assessment and management implications for genetically modified maize
Yann Devos, Sol Ortiz-García, Karen E. Hokanson and Alan RaybouldAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 259 19 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.032
Genetic Engineering of Horticultural Crops
M.S. Saraswathi, K. Kalaiponmani, S. Uma and S. BackiyaraniGenetic Engineering of Horticultural Crops 315 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810439-2.00014-3
How can China prepare for the domestic cultivation of Bt maize?
Yunhe Li, Eric M. Hallerman and Yufa PengTrends in Food Science & Technology 73 87 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.01.012
Challenges and Opportunities of Genetically Modified Crops Production; Future Perspectives in Ethiopia, Review
Kiros Gebretsadik and Ashenafi KifluThe Open Agriculture Journal 12 (1) 240 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874331501819010240
“Born to Run”? Not Necessarily: Species and Trait Bias in Persistent Free-Living Transgenic Plants
Norman C. EllstrandFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 6 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00088
Behavioral intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-stakeholder analysis
Omid M. Ghoochani, Mansour Ghanian, Masoud Baradaran, Erfan Alimirzaei and Hossein AzadiEnvironment, Development and Sustainability 20 (1) 233 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9879-3
Careful choice of insecticides in integrated pest management strategies against Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) in maize conserves Orius spp. in the field
Vasileios P. Vasileiadis, Andrea Veres, Donato Loddo, et al.Crop Protection 97 45 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.003
Paternal inheritance of plastid-encoded transgenes in Petunia hybrida in the greenhouse and under field conditions
Patricia Horn, Henrik Nausch, Susanne Baars, Jörg Schmidtke, Kerstin Schmidt, Anja Schneider, Dario Leister and Inge BroerBiotechnology Reports 16 26 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.11.001
Towards a new regulatory framework for GM crops in the European Union
M. KaiserTowards a new regulatory framework for GM crops in the European Union 111 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-845-2_6
A Lévy-flight diffusion model to predict transgenic pollen dispersal
Valentin Vallaeys, Rebecca C. Tyson, W. David Lane, Eric Deleersnijder and Emmanuel HanertJournal of The Royal Society Interface 14 (126) 20160889 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0889
The Costs of Coexistence Measures for Genetically Modified Maize in Germany
Thomas J. Venus, Koen Dillen, Maarten J. Punt and Justus H. H. WesselerJournal of Agricultural Economics 68 (2) 407 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12178
Outcrossing potential between 11 important genetically modified crops and the Chilean vascular flora
Miguel A. Sánchez, Pablo Cid, Humberto Navarrete, Carlos Aguirre, Gustavo Chacón, Erika Salazar and Humberto PrietoPlant Biotechnology Journal 14 (2) 625 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12408
Coexistence in European Agriculture?
Justus Wesseler and Maarten PuntEuroChoices 15 (1) 3 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12111
GM Crop Coexistence in Practice: Delivering Real Choices for Farmers and Consumers
Daniel PearsallEuroChoices 15 (1) 12 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12113
Considerations for Managing Agricultural Co-Existence between Transgenic and Non-Transgenic Cultivars of Outcrossing Perennial Forage Plants in Dairy Pastures
Kevin Smith and German SpangenbergAgronomy 6 (4) 59 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6040059
Pollen-mediated gene flow in the cultivation of transgenic cotton under experimental field conditions in Spain
Iñigo Loureiro, Esteban García-Ruiz, Elena Gutiérrez, et al.Industrial Crops and Products 85 22 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.045
On-farm evaluation of inundative biological control of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) by Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in three European maize-producing regions
Jaka Razinger, Vasileios P Vasileiadis, Marion Giraud, et al.Pest Management Science 72 (2) 246 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4054
1 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_538-1
Transgenic glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) can persist outside agricultural fields in Australia
R. Busi and S.B. PowlesAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 220 28 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.028
Identification of maize-derived dominant gametophyte factors
Zachary G. Jones, Major M. Goodman and Matthew D. KrakowskyEuphytica 209 (1) 63 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1635-0
Pollen-mediated gene flow and seed exchange in small-scale Zambian maize farming, implications for biosafety assessment
Thomas Bøhn, Denis W. Aheto, Felix S. Mwangala, Klara Fischer, Inger Louise Bones, Christopher Simoloka, Ireen Mbeule, Gunther Schmidt and Broder BrecklingScientific Reports 6 (1) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34483
Genetically modified crops in Switzerland: implications for agrosystem sustainability evidenced by multi-criteria model
Doris Wohlfender-Bühler, Elisabeth Feusthuber, Robert Wäger, Stefan Mann and Sylvain J. AubryAgronomy for Sustainable Development 36 (2) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0367-9
High-Resolution Gene Flow Model for Assessing Environmental Impacts of Transgene Escape Based on Biological Parameters and Wind Speed
Lei Wang, Patsy Haccou, Bao-Rong Lu and Shuang-Quan HuangPLOS ONE 11 (3) e0149563 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149563
Susceptibility of Dent‐Sterile Popcorn to the Ga1‐m Gametophyte Factor
Zachary G. Jones and Major M. GoodmanCrop Science 56 (5) 2594 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.02.0101
Gene flow from herbicide resistant genetically modified rice to conventional rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars
Sung Min Han, Bumkyu Lee, Ok Jae Won, et al.Journal of Ecology and Environment 38 (4) 397 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.042
Plant and arthropod diversity patterns of maize agro-ecosystems in two grassy biomes of South Africa
M. Botha, S. J. Siebert, J. van den Berg, B. G. Maliba and S. M. EllisBiodiversity and Conservation 24 (7) 1797 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0901-0
Cost of Coexistence of GM and Non‐GM Products in the Food Supply Chains of Rapeseed Oil and Maize Starch in Germany
Andreas Gabriel and Klaus MenradAgribusiness 31 (4) 472 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21415
Characterization of competitive interactions in the coexistence of Bt-transgenic and conventional rice
Yongbo Liu, Feng Ge, Yuyong Liang, Gang Wu and Junsheng LiBMC Biotechnology 15 (1) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-015-0141-0
High crop barrier reduces gene flow from transgenic to conventional maize in large fields
Yongbo Liu, Fajun Chen, Xiao Guan and Junsheng LiEuropean Journal of Agronomy 71 135 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.005
Modeling gene flow distribution within conventional fields and development of a simplified sampling method to quantify adventitious GM contents in maize
Enric Melé, Anna Nadal, Joaquima Messeguer, et al.Scientific Reports 5 (1) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17106
Probability functions to build composite indicators: A methodology to measure environmental impacts of genetically modified crops
F.J. Areal and L. RiesgoEcological Indicators 52 498 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.008
Combination Approach of Border Rows and Isolation Distance for Securing Coexistence of Non‐Genetically Modified and Genetically Modified Maize
Maren Langhof, Doreen Gabriel and Gerhard RühlCrop Science 55 (4) 1818 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.07.0523
The Biological and Agronomic (Non) Sense of Ex‐Ante Coexistence Measures
Hugh J. Beckie and Linda M. HallCrop Science 55 (5) 2215 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.02.0105
Assessing the Potential Effects of the European Union Multilevel Approach to the Coexistence Policy
Macario Rodríguez-Entrena and Melania Salazar-OrdóñezEuropean Review 23 (4) 489 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798715000332
Fine Mapping of the Maize Cross‐Incompatibility Locus Gametophytic Factor 1 (ga1) Using a Homogeneous Population
Xu Liu, He Sun, Ping Wu, Youhui Tian, Dezhou Cui, Chunyan Xu, Song Li, Peng Li, Hua Zhang, Tingting Chen, Detao Li, Xianrong Zhao, Yu'e Zhang, Yongbiao Xue and Huabang ChenCrop Science 54 (3) 873 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.09.0598
World Soybean Trade: Growth and Sustainability
Ian McFarlane and Ernesto A. O’ConnorModern Economy 05 (05) 580 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2014.55054
How can flexibility be integrated into coexistence regulations? A review
Yann Devos, Koen Dillen and Matty DemontJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94 (3) 381 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6358
229 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9440-9_16
Simulating the Gene Flow of Genetically Modified Maize in Taiwan
Bo-Jein Kuo, Shuo-Cheng Nieh, Guang-Jauh Shieh and Wen-Shin LinAgricultural Sciences 05 (05) 440 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.55045
Detection of Transgenes in Local Maize Varieties of Small-Scale Farmers in Eastern Cape, South Africa
Marianne Iversen, Idun M. Grønsberg, Johnnie van den Berg, et al.PLoS ONE 9 (12) e116147 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116147
Modelling ex-ante the economic and environmental impacts of Genetically Modified Herbicide Tolerant maize cultivation in Europe
Pascal Tillie, Koen Dillen and Emilio Rodríguez-CerezoAgricultural Systems 127 150 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.03.004
Direct and reverse pollen-mediated gene flow between GM rice and red rice weed
X. Serrat, R. Esteban, G. Penas, et al.AoB PLANTS 5 plt050 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plt050
Bred for Europe but grown in America: the case of GM sugar beet
Koen Dillen, Matty Demont, Pascal Tillie and Emilio Rodriguez CerezoNew Biotechnology 30 (2) 131 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2012.11.004
Paradoxical EU agricultural policies on genetically engineered crops
Gemma Masip, Maite Sabalza, Eduard Pérez-Massot, et al.Trends in Plant Science 18 (6) 312 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2013.03.004
Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape event GT73 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
EFSA Journal 11 (4) (2013)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3201
Scientific Opinion on an application from Pioneer Hi‐Bred International and Dow AgroSciences LLC (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐23) for placing on the market of genetically modified maize 59122 for food and feed uses, import, processing and cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003
EFSA Journal 11 (3) (2013)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3135
Impact of alternative information requirements on the coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM oilseed rape in the EU
Gunnar Breustedt, Uwe Latacz-Lohmann and Jörg Müller-ScheeßelEcological Economics 93 104 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.012
Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape events Ms8, Rf3 and Ms8 × Rf3 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
EFSA Journal 11 (4) (2013)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3202
Confronting coexistence in the United States: organic agriculture, genetic engineering, and the case of Roundup Ready® alfalfa
Kristina Hubbard and Neva HassaneinAgriculture and Human Values 30 (3) 325 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9394-6
Potential of genetically modified oilseed rape for biofuels in Austria: Land use patterns and coexistence constraints could decrease domestic feedstock production
Dietmar Moser, Michael Eckerstorfer, Kathrin Pascher, Franz Essl and Klaus Peter ZulkaBiomass and Bioenergy 50 35 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.004
1666 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_167
GM crop co-existence
Daniel PearsallGM Crops & Food 4 (3) 143 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.26303
Molecular markers as a complementary tool in risk assessments: quantifying interspecific gene flow from triticale to spring wheat and durum wheat
Vanessa B. Kavanagh, Melissa J. Hills, Aakash Goyal, et al.Transgenic Research 22 (4) 767 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-012-9683-2
Diversity of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) under three different control strategies against European corn borer in maize
František Kocourek, Pavel Saska and Milan ŘezáčPlant Protection Science 49 (3) 146 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.17221/78/2012-PPS
Estimates of genetically modified oilseed in shared farming machinery
T. Allnutt, J. Blackburn, J. Copeland, C. Dennis, J. Dixon, R. Laybourn, T. Wontner‐Smith, J. Chisholm, S. Hugo and C. HenryAnnals of Applied Biology 162 (1) 119 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12007
Updated Empirical Model of Genetically Modified Maize Grain Production Practices to Achieve European Union Labeling Thresholds
A. Marceau, D. I. Gustafson, I. O. Brants, F. Leprince, X. Foueillassar, L. Riesgo, F.‐J. Areal, S. Sowa, J. Kraic and E. M. BadeaCrop Science 53 (4) 1712 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.04.0224
Consequences of isolation distances on the allocation of GM maize fields in agricultural landscapes of Germany
Ulrich Stachow, Claudia Bethwell, Angelika Wurbs and Frieder GraefEnvironmental Sciences Europe 25 (1) 24 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-25-24
How to manage the coexistence between genetically modified and conventional crops in grain and oilseed collection areas? Elaboration of scenarios using role playing games
Christophe Sausse, Marianne Le Bail, Baptiste Lecroart, Brigitte Remy and Antoine MesséanLand Use Policy 30 (1) 719 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.018
543 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373781.ch28
1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373781.ch1
113 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373781.ch8
563 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373781.ch29
141 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373781.ch10
243 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118373781.ch15
Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40‐3‐2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto
EFSA Journal 10 (6) 2753 (2012)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2753
Les OGM : des modifications génétiques aux modifications géographiques ?
Éric GlonAnnales de géographie n° 683 (1) 3 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.683.0003
Assessment of regional capabilities for agricultural coexistence with genetically modified maize
Angelika Wurbs, Claudia Bethwell and Ulrich StachowEnvironmental Sciences Europe 24 (1) 17 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-24-17
Surveying of pollen-mediated crop-to-crop gene flow from a wheat field trial as a biosafety measure
Andrea Foetzki, Carolina Diaz Quijano, Odile Moullet, et al.GM Crops & Food 3 (2) 115 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.19512
Commercializing genetically modified crops under EU regulations
Alan Raybould and Guy M. PoppyGM Crops & Food 3 (1) 9 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.18961
Assessment of transgene flow in tomato and potential effects of genetically modified tomato expressing Cry3Bb1 toxins on bumblebee feeding behaviour
S. Arpaia, R. Battafarano, L.‐Y. Chen, Y. Devos, G.M. Di Leo and B.‐R. LuAnnals of Applied Biology 161 (2) 151 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2012.00559.x
GeneRisk
Claudia Bethwell, Christiane Eschenbach, Michael Glemnitz, et al.GeneRisk 93 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23433-0_6
GeneRisk
Claudia Bethwell, Thomas Weith and Klaus MüllerGeneRisk 237 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23433-0_15
Controlling Cyclic Epidemics on the Crops of the Agroecosystems: Articulate all the Dimensions in the Formalisation, but Look for a Local Solution
Lydia Bousset and Anne-Marie ChèvreJournal of Botany 2012 1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/938218
Scientific Opinion updating the risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the genetically modified insect resistant maize MON 810
EFSA Journal 10 (12) (2012)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.3017
27 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118352670.ch2
Assessment of the influence of field size on maize gene flow using SSR analysis
M. Palaudelmàs, E. Melé, A. Monfort, et al.Transgenic Research 21 (3) 471 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9549-z
Feral genetically modified herbicide tolerant oilseed rape from seed import spills: are concerns scientifically justified?
Yann Devos, Rosemary S. Hails, Antoine Messéan, Joe N. Perry and Geoffrey R. SquireTransgenic Research 21 (1) 1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-011-9515-9
Scientific Opinion on a request from the European Commission related to the prolongation of prohibition of the placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape event GT73 for import, processing and feed uses in Austria
EFSA Journal 10 (9) 2876 (2012)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2876
10765 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_167
How to manage the impact of gene flow on oilseed rape grain quality? Simulation case studies of three contrasted landscapes
Christophe Sausse, Nathalie Colbach, Mark W. Young and Geoffrey R. SquireEuropean Journal of Agronomy 38 32 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.12.002
Consequences of a coexistence policy on the adoption of GMHT crops in the European Union
Francisco J. Areal, Laura Riesgo, Manuel Gómez-Barbero and Emilio Rodríguez-CerezoFood Policy 37 (4) 401 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.04.003